Impact approach
We measure learning, not just clicks.
Before every pilot we define concrete questions. Reach, use, career-management skills and long-term outcomes are not conflated.
Define in advance
Success criteria, risks and stopping points are agreed before reviewing data.
Include lived experience
Young people, advisers and parents are heard separately and safely.
Report honestly
Ambiguous or negative findings are learning outcomes, not inconveniences.
Our impact chain
We do not expect a single app session to cause apprenticeship completion. The plausible chain starts smaller: clearer options, better questions, a planned reality test and more informed conversations. Application and transition outcomes can be considered later, with the many external influences they contain.
• Input: access, material and support.
• Activity: explore, compare, question and plan.
• Early outcome: career-management skill and action.
• Later outcome: transition, persistence and progression.
Claims we will not make
If 70 per cent of a pilot group open a resource, we have observed use—not better decisions. If participants then formulate clearer questions, that may be a learning signal but is not causal impact without a suitable design. Reports state that boundary explicitly.
• No causality from before-and-after alone.
• No success rate without denominator and participation context.
• No hiding non-use or dropout.
• No changing the main question afterwards to manufacture success.
Interested in piloting Apprentice Atlas?
Explore the pilot